Transparency?
What was it that ZerObama said his administration was going to be?
CNSNews.com - White House Won’t Reveal How Much Michelle Obama’s European Vacation Cost Taxpayers:
"America may be in the midst of a deep recession, and the nation may be facing unprecedented deficit spending and debt, but the White House will not reveal the cost to taxpayers of the European vacation that first lady Michelle Obama and the president’s two daughters, Malia and Sasha, took last month."This is transparent? What do you liberals have to say about Barry, now?
Labels: Barack Obama, campaign promises, economy, hypocricy, integrity, liberalism, sacrifice, spending, travelling
pontificated by SonarMan @ 8:27 AM
2 comments
links to this post
2 Comments:
What do I think of it ? Hmmm. I can't see that it's such a big deal.
(Your source is CNSnews ? Really? Boy, somebody needs to get out more.)
You see I'm still trying to get passed the 1.6 trillion dollars in tax cuts that the idiot-in-chief gave away to his wealthy buddies a few years ago and promptly ruined the economy.
Then there's the war of choice that's killed and wounded tens of thousands of US servicemen, just because a bunch of old white guys thought it would be a good idea.
Goofing off in the summer of 2001 while the CIA was warning of an imminent al-qaeda attack.
Anthrax.
Katrina.
Outing NOC agents at the CIA.
Haliburton.
Walter Reed.
Albert Gonzales.
Harriet Myers.
Jeff Gannon.
Breaking the army.
And lots, lots more.
So now we have a bright, articulate guy in the WH and all you can come up with is a snide remark about a meeting of world leaders (that Shrub used to attend often with family) and name-calling ?
Pathetic.
Gentle readers, notice how the Liberal dismisses waste, fraud, and abuse committed by his ideological fellow travelers. yet, hypocriticly he rails against it for others. He also changes the subject by pointing out past heavily distorted so-called scandals, clumsily misdirecting like a hack magician at a child's birthday party.
But we are like the smart one in the audience who sees this for what it is. The Liberal doesn't want you to focus on the topic of Obama's broken promise of transparency (amongst other broken promises that I've spoken of before herein). Also notice how he resorts to personal attacks, designed to discredit because he can't defend his position why its permissible for the Obama administration to hide the expenditure of our money.
He can't answer my question, nor does he think he has to. He, as do all Liberals, think they don't have to abide by their own Alice in Wonderland rules for which they hold others accountable.
Just stick to one topic at a time please, and tell me why its OK for Obama to hide this information after having promised us his administration would be transparent.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home